Page 245 - PERPUSTAKAAN UNIVERSITAS AIRLANGGA
P. 245

Kajian Dalam Bidang Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi: Filosofi, Teori, dan Praktik

            English academics’ experiences of information literacy, Andretta (2012)
            investigated  the  experience  of  information  literacy  among  postgraduate
            student studying Information Services Management, and Johnston (2014)
            investigated the information literacy experiences of English as a Foreign
            Language students.
                The relational perspective would be essential for information literacy
            research  to  investigate  the  way  people  learning  and  to  reveal  some
            important  aspects  that  is  beneficial  to  improve  people’s  experience  on
            using information (Bruce, 1997). It represents scholarly approach that can
            be applied for personal development as a requirement to be information
            literate individuals (Catt, 2005).

            3) Sociocultural Perspective
                The sociocultural perspective to information literacy emphasizes the
            relationship between individuals and communities where they engaged to
            (Limberg, Sundin & Talja, 2012). The information literacy was identified
            as  a  transformative  agent  that  enable  individuals  to  learn  from  the
            others (Lloyd, 2005). In this perspective the use of physical artefacts for
            communicating and for creating a relationship is emphasized (Limberg,
            Sundin & Talja, 2012). This includes artefacts which enable people to find,
            work with and use information, for instance scientific journals, databases
            and websites. James Wertsch (in Limberg, 2012) describes the sociocultural
            perspective as being primarily concerned with describing, interpreting, or
            explaining an action. Using the word action emphasises that information
            seeking  happens  through  a  succession  of  activities  of  social  character,
            information seeking is thus seen as embedded and embodied in different
            social practices (Lloyd, 2010).  Artefacts and activities take on meanings
            in  certain  practices  as  certain  points  and  therefore  information  literacy
            meaning should take these practices as a starting point.
                Sociocultural perspective is being used to inform a growing number
            of information literacy studies. For instance Spiranec and Zorica’s (2010)
            study attempt to re-conceptualized the definition of information literacy and
            identified the development of information literacy. The study focused on
            literature review and descriptive analysis from the features of information
            literacy, information literacy 2.0 and library user education. Spiranec and
            Zorica (2010) say that while the conceptual core of information literacy is
            on the abilities of an individual to seek and use information, the theoretical
            foundation  of  information  literacy  has  constantly  examined. A  shifting
            focus  of  information  literacy  from  traditional  understanding  towards
            information literacy 2.0 was identified. To be exact, information literacy 2.0
            is recognised as a concept that emphasizes a social, economic and cultural

            Heriyanto                                                     225
   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250